Monday, October 03, 2005

Harriet Miers

I'm cool with nominating a non-judge and all (in fact, I think the Supreme Court should have at least one non-judge, as strange as that may sound), but this Miers pick sucks balls. Way to follow up Roberts, Bush. Your telling me that she's going to be able to hold her intellectual own against the new Chief, let alone Scalia/Thomas or Ginsburg? This court is arguably the smartest it's *ever* been and now one of its slots appears to have been given over to blatant cronyism and tokenism.

(One final note: I really hate the idea that O'Connor's seat became a "woman's seat." How lame.)

1 Comments:

Alan said...

I don't understand this at all. What is the method behind this madness? Why nominate a non-judge for the SUPREME COURT?! Where's the sense in that?

12:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

  • August 2004
  • September 2004
  • October 2004
  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • January 2007: Sweet fancy Moses, Alex got engaged!

    Also, alphabet.