Are you kidding me?
I keep saying it, and they just keep proving me right. What more proof do you need that the BBC has a crippling liberal bias than using Michael Moore as their 2004 election anchor?
![]() |
|
![]() |
| |
||
| |
||
![]() |
|
Thursday, October 28, 2004Are you kidding me?
I keep saying it, and they just keep proving me right. What more proof do you need that the BBC has a crippling liberal bias than using Michael Moore as their 2004 election anchor?
|
|
1 Comments:
But, look, Moore being on BBC is not unbalanced, it is *the balance*. It balances out are own networks, which are nothing more than
flag-waving corporate lackeys. They offer no honest criticism. I'm well aware that Moore is a divisive, partisan figure, but having him on is something American networks will never do: provide a contrarian position that millions of Americans want to hear, but are not allowed to.
Post a Comment
<< Home